Industry news
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:32 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
 |
|
the_blogologist wrote:
http://www.state.gov/secretary/former/powell/remarks/2001/933.htm
Press Remarks with Foreign Minister of Egypt Amre Moussa
Secretary Colin L. Powell
Cairo, Egypt (Ittihadiya Palace)
February 24, 2001
...
He has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of
mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his
neighbors.
... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:33 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
|
|
CB wrote:
| Quote: |
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:465BAA4B.841E9B2D@hotmMOVEail.com...
CB wrote:
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:_Ss6i.3796$u56.948@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
CB wrote:
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:iyj6i.9529$2v1.2297@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
CB wrote:
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:t0i6i.3664$u56.2408@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
Roger wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:46592F94.4E3791ED@hotmMOVEail.com...
CB wrote:
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:mN16i.4411$C96.2286@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"And the answer is not very damned many." - Dick Cheney
It's not about Saddamn, it's about preventing the kook of Iran
from
taking
Iraq through his surrogates for a new Persia, then Israel and
finally OPEC.
Not necessarily in that order
Got it now dumb ass?
Got that you don't know what you're talking about...
Chickenhawk Cheney was talking about IRAQ.
You don't get it. He's talking about IRAN now.
Peabrains don't remember the past. That's how evil people get good
people to follow them.
Like Bush getting Americans to follow him into Iraq because of all
the
WMDs that Saddam *USED* to have?
Just like Bill Clinton would have done if only he had the moral
courage/authority. I don't need to dig up 'his and her' quotes do I?
I don't see how anyone could stop you.
As I recall, Clinton,(both of 'em), Kerry and the rest talked a lot
about the need to disarm Saddam, but not many advocated a 30,000
missile
bombardment followed by a mechanized invasion of 150,000 troops to do
it, except as a last resort.
I really must say in hindsight we should have done what Clinton did in
Kosovo from 20K feet. Unfortunately Bush chose to wage a PC war door
to
door to save innocent lives.
And he fucked that up like everything else has put his hand to.
Clinton was a hero for bombing farmers and aspirin factories while
Bush
is a bum for trying to save lives by going door do door
Too stupid to even comment on.
Because you know I'm 'right'
For that to happen you'd first have to recognize that thousands of
civilians
got killed by the US invading.
You're deluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuusional
|
Lancet report.
| Quote: |
Bush screwed up by not watching the borders. Again in hindsight we know
Iran
and Syria fund Islamo-fascists in a segregate war. Hopefully when the
kook
of Iran gets what's coming to him it will be from 20K feet exclusively.
--
CB
The illusion of America's loss in Iraq is nothing but the hopeful
fantasies
of useful idiots on the Left |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:34 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
|
|
CB wrote:
| Quote: |
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
Roger wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
CB wrote:
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
"And the answer is not very damned many." - Dick Cheney
It's not about Saddamn, it's about preventing the kook of Iran from
taking
Iraq through his surrogates for a new Persia, then Israel and
finally OPEC.
Not necessarily in that order
Got it now dumb ass?
Got that you don't know what you're talking about...
Chickenhawk Cheney was talking about IRAQ.
You don't get it. He's talking about IRAN now.
Peabrains don't remember the past. That's how evil people get good
people to follow them.
Like Bush getting Americans to follow him into Iraq because of all the
WMDs that Saddam *USED* to have?
No. They didn't remember he had WMD.
They have been told time after time that Saddam and Iraq had NOTHING to
do with 911. Yet they still think he did.
Who cares?
Saddamn had the potential of handing HIS KNOWN BUT MISSING WMD over to
agents such as al-Qaeda. What ever we have learned IN HINDSIGHT doesn't
matter. At the time EVERYONE thought Saddamn had them.
So, in a post 9/11 world only fools like you would have still given
Saddamn more potential time. Never mind IN HINDSIGHT we've come to know
that Saddamn bribed the UN Security Council so that he could ship oil out
and get anything he wanted back. The sanctions on Saddamn where a joke.
Saddamn's dead and so are his rapist sons, get over it, movon.std
If that was the goal of the war, why is it GETTING WORSE?
Because the Kook of Iran and Bashar Assad of Syria are funding mercenary
agents of Terror. All the while Libs refuse to recognize that fact and
refuse to support President Bush's efforts to prevent Iraq from falling into
their hands, thus the oil.
You Libs really haven't a clue as to the domino theory of Iraq falling into
chaos or America cutting & running.
No clue at all
|
Iraq is already in chaos and even republicons are giving Chimpoleon until
September...
RT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:55 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
|
|
77ogrA wrote:
| Quote: |
On May 28, 11:34 pm, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
CB wrote:
"Some dumb guy" <a...@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:g0k6i.3692$u56.601@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
CB wrote:
"Some dumb guy" <a...@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:D1i6i.3665$u56.2939@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
the_blogologist wrote:
Some dumb guy <a...@xyz.com> wrote:
"And the answer is not very damned many." - Dick Cheney
Radical islam wants to take over the world. They want to destroy
England, destroy Israel and destroy America. That's who we're fighting
in Iraq right now.
That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
But, hey... you're a Bushbot. It comes with the territory.
Things have changed homey. It's no longer Muslim sects vying for power in
Iraq. It's about Iranian mercenary agents trying to keep Iraq in chaos to
prevent an oasis from blooming in that Hell hole the Kook of Iran's
trying to plant.
Yes, if they would only allow the Christian Invaders to show them how much
better life could be under the benevolent guidance of the democratizing
Evangelical Christians they would understand what fools they are for
trying to show them the door.
The greatest examples would be Israel and Western civilization. What has
Islam done for the world...lately?
It's spread it's hatred, murder and 3rd world Barbarism as Genesis
describes. Arabs are "wild ass" men who were cursed by God to be 'nomads'.
When Cain murdered Able God cursed both the land and the descendants of
Able.
There is no mention of Arabs in the bible.
2 Chronicles 9:14
not including the revenues brought in by merchants and traders. Also
all the kings of Arabia and the governors of the land brought gold and
silver to Solomon.
# 1 Kings 10:15
not including the revenues from merchants and traders and from all the
Arabian kings and the governors of the land.
uneducated moron
|
There was no Arabia then. Arabia is not the same as arabs. Uneducated moron...
From the Catholic encyclopedia:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04749a.htm
...
(2) `Arabah
`Arabah, derived from the root 'arab, "to be arid", is another word for desert,
which seems to express more than one of its natural characteristics. The word
means a steppe, a desert plain; and it conveys the idea of a stretch of country,
arid, unproductive, and desolate. In poetic passages it is used in parallelism
with the word midbar. Thus Is., xxxv, 1: "The land that was desolate [midbar]
and impassable shall be glad, and the wilderness ['arabah] shall rejoice"; cf.
also Jer., xvii, 6, etc. Although the Septuagint frequently renders the word by
eremos, it often uses other translations, as ge dipsosa and elos. The Vulgate
employs the words solitudo, desertum. Very frequently the word 'arabah has a
mere geographical sense. Thus it refers to the strange depression extending from
the base of Mount Hermon, through the Jordan Valley and the Dead Sea, to the
Gulf of Akabah. So, too, there are the Arboth Moab (Numbers 22:1), the Arboth
Jericho (Joshua 4:13), etc., referring to the desolate districts connected with
these places.
... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:56 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
|
|
CB wrote:
| Quote: |
"Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:135nj3fhjad75d9@corp.supernews.com...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:4658f258$0$4897$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
It's not about Saddamn, it's about preventing the kook of Iran from
taking Iraq through his surrogates for a new Persia, then Israel and
finally OPEC. Not necessarily in that order
Why would the Iraqi people allow that to happen?
Their not like you and me, their like sheep after Saddamns brutal reign.
They'd follow the anti-Christ if he promised peace.
|
Is that why they're leaving their own country and they want us out?
| Quote: |
Oh they fight each other because of Islamic differences stirred up by
Iranian mercenaries (insurgents), but when it comes to defending their
|
Wrong. These are divisions that go back much further in time.
| Quote: |
sovereignty Iraqis are both over whelmed and confused as to where the enemy
is and where he came from.
They need our support and the Kook needs a bruise to the head
|
When are you enlisting?
RT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:56 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
|
|
CB wrote:
| Quote: |
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:465c0ce1$0$4904$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:465bbc2f$0$16522$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:465b5911$0$9886$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:465ae4f1$0$3249$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:465a7824$0$2806$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:t0i6i.3664$u56.2408@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
Roger wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:46592F94.4E3791ED@hotmMOVEail.com...
CB wrote:
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:mN16i.4411$C96.2286@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"And the answer is not very damned many." - Dick Cheney
It's not about Saddamn, it's about preventing the kook of Iran
from taking
Iraq through his surrogates for a new Persia, then Israel and
finally OPEC.
Not necessarily in that order
Got it now dumb ass?
Got that you don't know what you're talking about...
Chickenhawk Cheney was talking about IRAQ.
You don't get it. He's talking about IRAN now.
Peabrains don't remember the past. That's how evil people get good
people to follow them.
Like Bush getting Americans to follow him into Iraq because of all
the WMDs that Saddam *USED* to have?
No. They didn't remember he had WMD.
They have been told time after time that Saddam and Iraq had NOTHING
to do with 911. Yet they still think he did.
Who cares?
Saddamn had the potential of handing HIS KNOWN BUT MISSING WMD over to
agents such as al-Qaeda. What ever we have learned IN HINDSIGHT doesn't
matter. At the time EVERYONE thought Saddamn had them.
So, in a post 9/11 world only fools like you would have still given
Saddamn more potential time. Never mind IN HINDSIGHT we've come to know
that Saddamn bribed the UN Security Council so that he could ship oil
out and get anything he wanted back. The sanctions on Saddamn where a
joke.
Saddamn's dead and so are his rapist sons, get over it, movon.std
If that was the goal of the war, why is it GETTING WORSE?
Because the Kook of Iran and Bashar Assad of Syria are funding mercenary
agents of Terror. All the while Libs refuse to recognize that fact and
refuse to support President Bush's efforts to prevent Iraq from falling
into their hands, thus the oil.
You Libs really haven't a clue as to the domino theory of Iraq falling
into chaos or America cutting & running.
No clue at all
If that was the goal of the war, why is it GETTING WORSE?
Because the Kook and Assad haved learned what works and Armerica still
fights like a girl
|
SO, coward, how do you recommend fighting????
RT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:57 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
|
|
CB wrote:
| Quote: |
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:IjE6i.24315$JZ3.22773@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net...
CB wrote:
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:465a7824$0$2806$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:t0i6i.3664$u56.2408@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
Roger wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:46592F94.4E3791ED@hotmMOVEail.com...
CB wrote:
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:mN16i.4411$C96.2286@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"And the answer is not very damned many." - Dick Cheney
It's not about Saddamn, it's about preventing the kook of Iran from
taking
Iraq through his surrogates for a new Persia, then Israel and
finally OPEC.
Not necessarily in that order
Got it now dumb ass?
Got that you don't know what you're talking about...
Chickenhawk Cheney was talking about IRAQ.
You don't get it. He's talking about IRAN now.
Peabrains don't remember the past. That's how evil people get good
people to follow them.
Like Bush getting Americans to follow him into Iraq because of all the
WMDs that Saddam *USED* to have?
No. They didn't remember he had WMD.
They have been told time after time that Saddam and Iraq had NOTHING to
do with 911. Yet they still think he did.
Who cares?
Saddamn had the potential of handing HIS KNOWN BUT MISSING WMD over to
agents such as al-Qaeda.
And Saddam would have risked being the first one against whom al Qaeda
used those weapons. Do you really think that Saddam would hand over
advanced weapons technology, even if he possessed it, to his arch foe, bin
Laden?
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend." Especially since we thumped Saddamn's
aspirations to control OPEC by way of Kuwait.
|
Saddam wanted to control OPEC???? HAHAHAHHAHAHA
Cite, please ->
| Quote: |
Please tell the world what you think, Christ-Boy.
Without reservation |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:58 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
|
|
CB wrote:
| Quote: |
"77ogrA" <adravirgo@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180418143.174905.201080@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On May 28, 11:34 pm, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
CB wrote:
"Some dumb guy" <a...@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:g0k6i.3692$u56.601@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
CB wrote:
"Some dumb guy" <a...@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:D1i6i.3665$u56.2939@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
the_blogologist wrote:
Some dumb guy <a...@xyz.com> wrote:
"And the answer is not very damned many." - Dick Cheney
Radical islam wants to take over the world. They want to destroy
England, destroy Israel and destroy America. That's who we're
fighting
in Iraq right now.
That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
But, hey... you're a Bushbot. It comes with the territory.
Things have changed homey. It's no longer Muslim sects vying for
power in
Iraq. It's about Iranian mercenary agents trying to keep Iraq in
chaos to
prevent an oasis from blooming in that Hell hole the Kook of Iran's
trying to plant.
Yes, if they would only allow the Christian Invaders to show them how
much
better life could be under the benevolent guidance of the
democratizing
Evangelical Christians they would understand what fools they are for
trying to show them the door.
The greatest examples would be Israel and Western civilization. What
has
Islam done for the world...lately?
It's spread it's hatred, murder and 3rd world Barbarism as Genesis
describes. Arabs are "wild ass" men who were cursed by God to be
'nomads'.
When Cain murdered Able God cursed both the land and the descendants of
Able.
There is no mention of Arabs in the bible.
2 Chronicles 9:14
not including the revenues brought in by merchants and traders. Also
all the kings of Arabia and the governors of the land brought gold and
silver to Solomon.
# 1 Kings 10:15
not including the revenues from merchants and traders and from all the
Arabian kings and the governors of the land.
Thanks
|
There was no Arabia then. Arabia is not the same as arabs.
From the Catholic encyclopedia:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04749a.htm
...
(2) `Arabah
`Arabah, derived from the root 'arab, "to be arid", is another word for desert,
which seems to express more than one of its natural characteristics. The word
means a steppe, a desert plain; and it conveys the idea of a stretch of country,
arid, unproductive, and desolate. In poetic passages it is used in parallelism
with the word midbar. Thus Is., xxxv, 1: "The land that was desolate [midbar]
and impassable shall be glad, and the wilderness ['arabah] shall rejoice"; cf.
also Jer., xvii, 6, etc. Although the Septuagint frequently renders the word by
eremos, it often uses other translations, as ge dipsosa and elos. The Vulgate
employs the words solitudo, desertum. Very frequently the word 'arabah has a
mere geographical sense. Thus it refers to the strange depression extending from
the base of Mount Hermon, through the Jordan Valley and the Dead Sea, to the
Gulf of Akabah. So, too, there are the Arboth Moab (Numbers 22:1), the Arboth
Jericho (Joshua 4:13), etc., referring to the desolate districts connected with
these places.
...
Your welcome.
RT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:59 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
|
|
CB wrote:
| Quote: |
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
CB wrote:
"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjv@mindspring.com> wrote in message
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
"And the answer is not very damned many." - Dick Cheney
It's not about Saddamn, it's about preventing the kook of Iran from
taking Iraq through his surrogates for a new Persia, then Israel and
finally OPEC. Not necessarily in that order
Got it now dumb ass?
That makes absolutely no sense.
Because you can't accept that things change and we adapt or suffer the
consequences
There were no al-quaida fighters in Iraq
when Sadam ran the show,
Saddamns gone, that was a change.
then we got in there and now there's al-quaida,
sunnis militias, shia militia, kurdish fighters all having a good time
killing us.
Supported by the kook of Iran. Things have changed.
Why the heck did we invade Iraq when we haven't secured Afghanistan?
Nothing is ever secure. The argument used to be that Saddanm was
contained but IN HINDSIGHT we've found he bribed the UN Security Council
and could get ANYTHING he wanted. Only his people suffered and he used
that as propaganda. The man was a Sociopath
How
smart was that? How many thousands of Americans, British and Iraqi
lives has this cost?
You look at immediate circumstances, I look into the future. Unlike you
America's Army can do more than one thing at a time.
Yeah, they can fail in Afghanistan and fail in Iraq.
Because of loosers like you rooting for the enemy.
|
Why do you want to weaken our military?
| Quote: |
And if Bush and you have your way, they will soon fail in Iran.
If I had my way the Kook would be crying out to the mountains to fall on
him.
|
All you have to do is enlist... coward.
| Quote: |
That is price to be paid for allowing religious dogma to dictate foreign
policy.
What is the price for cutting & running?
|
What is the price of the continued death of American troops, the continued
expenditure (now around half a trillion dollars), and the continued weakening
of our armed forces???
| Quote: |
Oh, by the way, were's Osama? How many has our army killed versus how
many have been killed or arrested by the police world wide?
As much as Osama would be a great trophy for Bush, it's the kook of Iran
who's now running the Fascist show.
Why doesn't any of you Leftists address what I've been saying about the
kook of Iran, his obsession to resurrect the 12 imam, his lust for Jewish
blood, a new Persia and OPEC?
All you whine about is how bad things are going. Stick your thumb in your
mouth, you'll get some satisfaction |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:01 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
|
|
CB wrote:
| Quote: |
"Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in message
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
CB wrote:
"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjv@mindspring.com> wrote in message
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
"And the answer is not very damned many." - Dick Cheney
It's not about Saddamn, it's about preventing the kook of Iran from
taking Iraq through his surrogates for a new Persia, then Israel and
finally OPEC. Not necessarily in that order
Got it now dumb ass?
Because you can't accept that things change and we adapt or suffer the
consequences
There were no al-quaida fighters in Iraq
when Sadam ran the show,
Saddamns gone, that was a change.
then we got in there and now there's al-quaida,
sunnis militias, shia militia, kurdish fighters all having a good time
killing us.
Supported by the kook of Iran. Things have changed.
Why the heck did we invade Iraq when we haven't secured Afghanistan?
Nothing is ever secure. The argument used to be that Saddanm was
contained but IN HINDSIGHT we've found he bribed the UN Security
Council and could get ANYTHING he wanted. Only his people suffered and
he used that as propaganda. The man was a Sociopath
How
smart was that? How many thousands of Americans, British and Iraqi
lives has this cost?
You look at immediate circumstances, I look into the future. Unlike you
America's Army can do more than one thing at a time.
Yeah, they can fail in Afghanistan and fail in Iraq.
Because of loosers like you rooting for the enemy.
cuckoo cuckoo cuckoo
Speak of the Devil
|
No one mentioned your name.
| Quote: |
And if Bush and you have your way, they will soon fail in Iran.
If I had my way the Kook would be crying out to the mountains to fall on
him.
Why? Your boys put him in by threatening Iran.
The Kook was one of the Iranian Terrorists who kidnapped US embassy
|
So?
| Quote: |
personnel during Carters betrayal. Thanks goes to him for not sending the
message America will not be held hostage (thank God for Reagan).
Islamo-fascists put him in power because America treats kooks diplomatically
and finally has to fight...like a girl..
|
And how would you fight.... coward?
| Quote: |
That is price to be paid for allowing religious dogma to dictate foreign
policy.
What is the price for cutting & running?
We get to keep our sons and daughters.
Allowing the enemy to regroup, re-supply and advance
|
When are you enlisting, coward? Time to put your money where your mouth is...
RT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Some dumb guy
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:01 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
|
|
Rich Travsky wrote:
| Quote: |
CB wrote:
"Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:135nj3fhjad75d9@corp.supernews.com...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:4658f258$0$4897$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
It's not about Saddamn, it's about preventing the kook of Iran from
taking Iraq through his surrogates for a new Persia, then Israel and
finally OPEC. Not necessarily in that order
Why would the Iraqi people allow that to happen?
Their not like you and me, their like sheep after Saddamns brutal reign.
They'd follow the anti-Christ if he promised peace.
Is that why they're leaving their own country and they want us out?
Oh they fight each other because of Islamic differences stirred up by
Iranian mercenaries (insurgents), but when it comes to defending their
Wrong. These are divisions that go back much further in time.
|
Good point.
The sectarian divisions that people have only just woken up to are, in
reality, just a thin veneer, just recently applied, over hatreds whose
origins are lost in the mists of time.
| Quote: |
sovereignty Iraqis are both over whelmed and confused as to where the enemy
is and where he came from.
They need our support and the Kook needs a bruise to the head
When are you enlisting?
RT |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:19 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
|
|
Some dumb guy wrote:
| Quote: |
Rich Travsky wrote:
CB wrote:
"Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:135nj3fhjad75d9@corp.supernews.com...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:4658f258$0$4897$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
It's not about Saddamn, it's about preventing the kook of Iran from
taking Iraq through his surrogates for a new Persia, then Israel and
finally OPEC. Not necessarily in that order
Why would the Iraqi people allow that to happen?
Their not like you and me, their like sheep after Saddamns brutal reign.
They'd follow the anti-Christ if he promised peace.
Is that why they're leaving their own country and they want us out?
Oh they fight each other because of Islamic differences stirred up by
Iranian mercenaries (insurgents), but when it comes to defending their
Wrong. These are divisions that go back much further in time.
Good point.
The sectarian divisions that people have only just woken up to are, in
reality, just a thin veneer, just recently applied, over hatreds whose
origins are lost in the mists of time.
|
Like Yugoslavia, many groups were combined under one flag so to speak and when
the power that held them together, like Tito or Saddam, it will prove hard
to keep it all from breaking up.
| Quote: |
sovereignty Iraqis are both over whelmed and confused as to where the enemy
is and where he came from.
They need our support and the Kook needs a bruise to the head
When are you enlisting?
RT |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Some dumb guy
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:22 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
|
|
Rich Travsky wrote:
| Quote: |
Some dumb guy wrote:
Rich Travsky wrote:
CB wrote:
"Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:135nj3fhjad75d9@corp.supernews.com...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:4658f258$0$4897$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
It's not about Saddamn, it's about preventing the kook of Iran from
taking Iraq through his surrogates for a new Persia, then Israel and
finally OPEC. Not necessarily in that order
Why would the Iraqi people allow that to happen?
Their not like you and me, their like sheep after Saddamns brutal reign.
They'd follow the anti-Christ if he promised peace.
Is that why they're leaving their own country and they want us out?
Oh they fight each other because of Islamic differences stirred up by
Iranian mercenaries (insurgents), but when it comes to defending their
Wrong. These are divisions that go back much further in time.
Good point.
The sectarian divisions that people have only just woken up to are, in
reality, just a thin veneer, just recently applied, over hatreds whose
origins are lost in the mists of time.
Like Yugoslavia, many groups were combined under one flag so to speak and when
the power that held them together, like Tito or Saddam, it will prove hard
to keep it all from breaking up.
|
Another good observation and one that many lose sight of: the need for a
strong man to keep together a political entity composed of widely
disparate components.
| Quote: |
sovereignty Iraqis are both over whelmed and confused as to where the enemy
is and where he came from.
They need our support and the Kook needs a bruise to the head
When are you enlisting?
RT |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
CB
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:40 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
|
|
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:465cb107$0$30654$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
| Quote: |
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:465c42d9$0$2364$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:465c0ce1$0$4904$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:465bbc2f$0$16522$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:465b5911$0$9886$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:465ae4f1$0$3249$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:465a7824$0$2806$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:t0i6i.3664$u56.2408@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
Roger wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:46592F94.4E3791ED@hotmMOVEail.com...
CB wrote:
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:mN16i.4411$C96.2286@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"And the answer is not very damned many." - Dick Cheney
It's not about Saddamn, it's about preventing the kook of Iran
from taking
Iraq through his surrogates for a new Persia, then Israel and
finally OPEC.
Not necessarily in that order
Got it now dumb ass?
Got that you don't know what you're talking about...
Chickenhawk Cheney was talking about IRAQ.
You don't get it. He's talking about IRAN now.
Peabrains don't remember the past. That's how evil people get good
people to follow them.
Like Bush getting Americans to follow him into Iraq because of all
the WMDs that Saddam *USED* to have?
No. They didn't remember he had WMD.
They have been told time after time that Saddam and Iraq had NOTHING
to do with 911. Yet they still think he did.
Who cares?
Saddamn had the potential of handing HIS KNOWN BUT MISSING WMD over
to agents such as al-Qaeda. What ever we have learned IN HINDSIGHT
doesn't matter. At the time EVERYONE thought Saddamn had them.
So, in a post 9/11 world only fools like you would have still given
Saddamn more potential time. Never mind IN HINDSIGHT we've come to
know that Saddamn bribed the UN Security Council so that he could
ship oil out and get anything he wanted back. The sanctions on
Saddamn where a joke.
Saddamn's dead and so are his rapist sons, get over it, movon.std
If that was the goal of the war, why is it GETTING WORSE?
Because the Kook of Iran and Bashar Assad of Syria are funding
mercenary agents of Terror. All the while Libs refuse to recognize that
fact and refuse to support President Bush's efforts to prevent Iraq
from falling into their hands, thus the oil.
You Libs really haven't a clue as to the domino theory of Iraq falling
into chaos or America cutting & running.
No clue at all
If that was the goal of the war, why is it GETTING WORSE?
Because the Kook and Assad haved learned what works and Armerica still
fights like a girl
In your warped little mind, we haven't killed ENOUGH IRAQIS!
I thought we were bringing "democracy" to them, not death.
|
Again you deny what I've been saying. We're fighting surrogates of the Kook
and Assad.
Big time |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Some dumb guy
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:42 am Post subject: Re: "The question in my mind is how many additional American |
|
|
CB wrote:
| Quote: |
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:465cb107$0$30654$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:465c42d9$0$2364$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:465c0ce1$0$4904$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:465bbc2f$0$16522$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:465b5911$0$9886$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:465ae4f1$0$3249$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:465a7824$0$2806$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:t0i6i.3664$u56.2408@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
Roger wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:46592F94.4E3791ED@hotmMOVEail.com...
CB wrote:
"Some dumb guy" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
news:mN16i.4411$C96.2286@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
"And the answer is not very damned many." - Dick Cheney
It's not about Saddamn, it's about preventing the kook of Iran
from taking
Iraq through his surrogates for a new Persia, then Israel and
finally OPEC.
Not necessarily in that order
Got it now dumb ass?
Got that you don't know what you're talking about...
Chickenhawk Cheney was talking about IRAQ.
You don't get it. He's talking about IRAN now.
Peabrains don't remember the past. That's how evil people get good
people to follow them.
Like Bush getting Americans to follow him into Iraq because of all
the WMDs that Saddam *USED* to have?
No. They didn't remember he had WMD.
They have been told time after time that Saddam and Iraq had NOTHING
to do with 911. Yet they still think he did.
Who cares?
Saddamn had the potential of handing HIS KNOWN BUT MISSING WMD over
to agents such as al-Qaeda. What ever we have learned IN HINDSIGHT
doesn't matter. At the time EVERYONE thought Saddamn had them.
So, in a post 9/11 world only fools like you would have still given
Saddamn more potential time. Never mind IN HINDSIGHT we've come to
know that Saddamn bribed the UN Security Council so that he could
ship oil out and get anything he wanted back. The sanctions on
Saddamn where a joke.
Saddamn's dead and so are his rapist sons, get over it, movon.std
If that was the goal of the war, why is it GETTING WORSE?
Because the Kook of Iran and Bashar Assad of Syria are funding
mercenary agents of Terror. All the while Libs refuse to recognize that
fact and refuse to support President Bush's efforts to prevent Iraq
from falling into their hands, thus the oil.
You Libs really haven't a clue as to the domino theory of Iraq falling
into chaos or America cutting & running.
No clue at all
If that was the goal of the war, why is it GETTING WORSE?
Because the Kook and Assad haved learned what works and Armerica still
fights like a girl
In your warped little mind, we haven't killed ENOUGH IRAQIS!
I thought we were bringing "democracy" to them, not death.
Again you deny what I've been saying. We're fighting surrogates of the Kook
and Assad.
|
And they seem to be winning.
| Quote: |
My mistake.
Big time
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
1307 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
