Industry news
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rich Travsky Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 8:47 pm Post subject: Re: North Korea Tests More Missiles - When Do We Invade? |
|
|
On May 27, 1:45 am, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
I would hardly expect Rich Trotsky to advocate a military attack on
the DPRK. Why the sudden change from peacenik to war hawk?
Or do you suggest that we shouldn't do anything unless we can do
everything? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
lubow Guest
|
Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 9:09 pm Post subject: Re: North Korea Tests More Missiles - When Do We Invade? |
|
|
Invade?
How many bbl/per day does North Korea produce?
--
Lubow
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4659290A.FAE225CA@hotmMOVEail.com...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' ) Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 7:19 am Post subject: Re: North Korea Tests More Missiles - When Do We Invade? |
|
|
Rich Trolsky wrote:
it has been answered over and over proves, I mean other than you are a
trolling idiot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' ) Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 7:20 am Post subject: Re: North Korea Tests More Missiles - When Do We Invade? |
|
|
harangueman@yahoo.com wrote:
| Quote: |
On May 27, 1:45 am, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Ref at
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22north+Korea%22+missiles...
North Korea fired a salvo of test missiles into its coastal waters Friday, flexing
its naval muscles as South Korea launched its most advanced destroyer ever,
armed with a high-tech U.S. air-defense system.
...
Well?
I would hardly expect Rich Trotsky to advocate a military attack on
the DPRK. Why the sudden change from peacenik to war hawk?
Sudden? He's been asking when the US is going to invade NK since, oh, |
since like 2003.
| Quote: |
Or do you suggest that we shouldn't do anything unless we can do
everything?
To him, you are a hypocrite if you invade one country but don't invade |
every other country on the planet.
--
"There are some gals who don't like to be pushed and grabbed and lassoed
and drug into buses in the middle of the night."
"How else was I gonna get her on the bus? Well, I'm askin' ya.",
George Axelrod, "Bus Stop" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:14 am Post subject: Re: North Korea Tests More Missiles - When Do We Invade? |
|
|
patient WA-2349-06 male Caucasian, paranoid-schizophrenic Bill Bonde giggled 'Hi ho':
| Quote: |
Rich Trolsky wrote:
Ref at
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22north+Korea%22+missiles&btnG=Search+News
North Korea fired a salvo of test missiles into its coastal waters Friday, flexing
its naval muscles as South Korea launched its most advanced destroyer ever, armed
with a high-tech U.S. air-defense system.
...
Well?
What do you think asking that stupid question over and over again after
it has been answered over and over proves, I mean other than you are a
trolling idiot.
|
Poor Billie Bonkers still doesn't see that North Korea fulfills all the otherwise
lies used to invade Iraq...
RT |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:17 am Post subject: Re: North Korea Tests More Missiles - When Do We Invade? |
|
|
patient WA-2349-06 male Caucasian, paranoid-schizophrenic Bill Bonde giggled 'Hi ho':
| Quote: |
harangueman@yahoo.com wrote:
On May 27, 1:45 am, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Ref at
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22north+Korea%22+missiles...
North Korea fired a salvo of test missiles into its coastal waters Friday, flexing
its naval muscles as South Korea launched its most advanced destroyer ever,
armed with a high-tech U.S. air-defense system.
...
Well?
I would hardly expect Rich Trotsky to advocate a military attack on
the DPRK. Why the sudden change from peacenik to war hawk?
Sudden? He's been asking when the US is going to invade NK since, oh,
since like 2003.
|
The poor rightards still don't understand that North Korea really does fulfill
the "reasons" Chimpoleon gave for invading Iraq.
| Quote: |
Or do you suggest that we shouldn't do anything unless we can do
everything?
To him, you are a hypocrite if you invade one country but don't invade
every other country on the planet.
|
It's worse than hypocrisy to cook up lies to invade a country.
RT |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Richard Burns Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:37 am Post subject: Re: North Korea Tests More Missiles - When Do We Invade? |
|
|
Rich Travsky wrote:
| Quote: |
patient WA-2349-06 male Caucasian, paranoid-schizophrenic Bill Bonde giggled 'Hi ho':
Rich Trolsky wrote:
Ref at
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22north+Korea%22+missiles&btnG=Search+News
North Korea fired a salvo of test missiles into its coastal waters Friday, flexing
its naval muscles as South Korea launched its most advanced destroyer ever, armed
with a high-tech U.S. air-defense system.
...
Well?
What do you think asking that stupid question over and over again after
it has been answered over and over proves, I mean other than you are a
trolling idiot.
Poor Billie Bonkers still doesn't see that North Korea fulfills all the otherwise
lies used to invade Iraq...
RT
|
Even most neocons know that a preemptive war would be bad for the GOP
and their business puppetmasters...tens of thousands of U.S. and South
Korean troops likely dead in a North Korean counterattack acrosss the
DMZ as well as North Korea flattening large chunks of Seoul, the capital
of the world's 10th largest economy, thru missile and artillery
strikes..and that's assuming the can't get some of their tanks
thru..this war would make Iraq and even a hypothetical attack
on Iran look mild in comparison. The aftereffcts would
probably plunge the world into depression.
If Japan gets hit as a result of a North Korean counterattack,
it may result in the presence of Japanese troops on the Korean
peninsula in a counterattack of their own. Japanese rightists
would try to stretch out an occupation as long as possible and possibly
try to extend it to South Korea for "security" reasons.
Could the U.S. win...certainly...eventually..after extremely heavy
casualties...it would probably the deadliest U.S. war since World War
II. Casualties could be in the hundreds of thousands within three
months, according to some estimates.
Such a war, if not viewed as absolutely necessary, could prove
potentially for the GOP and the conservative movement in the United
States and put corporate/elite interests in serious jeopardy by
pushing American public opinion significantly leftward on issues
as a whole, including corporate power.
Richard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:16 am Post subject: Re: North Korea Tests More Missiles - When Do We Invade? |
|
|
Richard Burns wrote:
| Quote: |
Rich Travsky wrote:
patient WA-2349-06 male Caucasian, paranoid-schizophrenic Bill Bonde giggled 'Hi ho':
Rich Trolsky wrote:
Ref at
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22north+Korea%22+missiles&btnG=Search+News
North Korea fired a salvo of test missiles into its coastal waters Friday, flexing
its naval muscles as South Korea launched its most advanced destroyer ever, armed
with a high-tech U.S. air-defense system.
...
Well?
What do you think asking that stupid question over and over again after
it has been answered over and over proves, I mean other than you are a
trolling idiot.
Poor Billie Bonkers still doesn't see that North Korea fulfills all the otherwise
lies used to invade Iraq...
RT
Even most neocons know that a preemptive war would be bad for the GOP
and their business puppetmasters...tens of thousands of U.S. and South
Korean troops likely dead in a North Korean counterattack acrosss the
DMZ as well as North Korea flattening large chunks of Seoul, the capital
of the world's 10th largest economy, thru missile and artillery
strikes..and that's assuming the can't get some of their tanks
thru..this war would make Iraq and even a hypothetical attack
on Iran look mild in comparison. The aftereffcts would
probably plunge the world into depression.
If Japan gets hit as a result of a North Korean counterattack,
it may result in the presence of Japanese troops on the Korean
peninsula in a counterattack of their own. Japanese rightists
would try to stretch out an occupation as long as possible and possibly
try to extend it to South Korea for "security" reasons.
Could the U.S. win...certainly...eventually..after extremely heavy
casualties...it would probably the deadliest U.S. war since World War
II. Casualties could be in the hundreds of thousands within three
months, according to some estimates.
Such a war, if not viewed as absolutely necessary, could prove
potentially for the GOP and the conservative movement in the United
States and put corporate/elite interests in serious jeopardy by
pushing American public opinion significantly leftward on issues
as a whole, including corporate power.
Richard.
|
The US no longer has the capability to respond militarily to the NKs should
they try anything.
RT |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' ) Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:35 am Post subject: Re: North Korea Tests More Missiles - When Do We Invade? |
|
|
Rich Trolsky wrote:
| Quote: |
patient WA-2349-06 male Caucasian, paranoid-schizophrenic Bill Bonde giggled 'Hi ho':
harangueman@yahoo.com wrote:
On May 27, 1:45 am, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Ref at
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22north+Korea%22+missiles...
North Korea fired a salvo of test missiles into its coastal waters Friday, flexing
its naval muscles as South Korea launched its most advanced destroyer ever,
armed with a high-tech U.S. air-defense system.
...
Well?
I would hardly expect Rich Trotsky to advocate a military attack on
the DPRK. Why the sudden change from peacenik to war hawk?
Sudden? He's been asking when the US is going to invade NK since, oh,
since like 2003.
The poor rightards still don't understand that North Korea really does fulfill
the "reasons" Chimpoleon gave for invading Iraq.
I think the point I've been making is that North Korea has effective |
deterrence, even excluding its nuclear capabilities whatever they may
be. For some reason you think that the US should invade a country that
that isn't an option with.
| Quote: |
Or do you suggest that we shouldn't do anything unless we can do
everything?
To him, you are a hypocrite if you invade one country but don't invade
every other country on the planet.
It's worse than hypocrisy to cook up lies to invade a country.
What are the "lies" supposed to be? Iraq is in a part of the world that |
is vital to the United States. Dealing with Iraq also helps with the
process of dealing with bin Ladenism. What is North Korea again? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' ) Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:52 am Post subject: Re: North Korea Tests More Missiles - When Do We Invade? |
|
|
Rich Trolsky wrote:
| Quote: |
Richard Burns wrote:
Rich Travsky wrote:
patient WA-2349-06 male Caucasian, paranoid-schizophrenic Bill Bonde giggled 'Hi ho':
Rich Trolsky wrote:
Ref at
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22north+Korea%22+missiles&btnG=Search+News
North Korea fired a salvo of test missiles into its coastal waters Friday, flexing
its naval muscles as South Korea launched its most advanced destroyer ever, armed
with a high-tech U.S. air-defense system.
...
Well?
What do you think asking that stupid question over and over again after
it has been answered over and over proves, I mean other than you are a
trolling idiot.
Poor Billie Bonkers still doesn't see that North Korea fulfills all the otherwise
lies used to invade Iraq...
RT
Even most neocons know that a preemptive war would be bad for the GOP
and their business puppetmasters...tens of thousands of U.S. and South
Korean troops likely dead in a North Korean counterattack acrosss the
DMZ as well as North Korea flattening large chunks of Seoul, the capital
of the world's 10th largest economy, thru missile and artillery
strikes..and that's assuming the can't get some of their tanks
thru..this war would make Iraq and even a hypothetical attack
on Iran look mild in comparison. The aftereffcts would
probably plunge the world into depression.
If Japan gets hit as a result of a North Korean counterattack,
it may result in the presence of Japanese troops on the Korean
peninsula in a counterattack of their own. Japanese rightists
would try to stretch out an occupation as long as possible and possibly
try to extend it to South Korea for "security" reasons.
Could the U.S. win...certainly...eventually..after extremely heavy
casualties...it would probably the deadliest U.S. war since World War
II. Casualties could be in the hundreds of thousands within three
months, according to some estimates.
Such a war, if not viewed as absolutely necessary, could prove
potentially for the GOP and the conservative movement in the United
States and put corporate/elite interests in serious jeopardy by
pushing American public opinion significantly leftward on issues
as a whole, including corporate power.
Richard.
The US no longer has the capability to respond militarily to the NKs should
they try anything.
The US never had the capability to stop NK should it try anything, short |
of using nuclear weapons, of course. NK has a million man army and the
only hope of stopping them is that they will likely all run to the
nearest Safeway for something to eat, and to the Macy's for a bit of
fashion, right after they get across the border. Maybe we could just
lock the doors and hold them there: "You have mo' Binny Baby, please?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 6:59 am Post subject: Re: North Korea Tests More Missiles - When Do We Invade? |
|
|
patient WA-2349-06 male Caucasian, paranoid-schizophrenic Bill Bonde girlishly
giggled 'Hi ho': wrote:
| Quote: |
Rich Trolsky wrote:
patient WA-2349-06 male Caucasian, paranoid-schizophrenic Bill Bonde giggled 'Hi ho':
harangueman@yahoo.com wrote:
On May 27, 1:45 am, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Ref at
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22north+Korea%22+missiles...
North Korea fired a salvo of test missiles into its coastal waters Friday, flexing
its naval muscles as South Korea launched its most advanced destroyer ever,
armed with a high-tech U.S. air-defense system.
...
Well?
I would hardly expect Rich Trotsky to advocate a military attack on
the DPRK. Why the sudden change from peacenik to war hawk?
Sudden? He's been asking when the US is going to invade NK since, oh,
since like 2003.
The poor rightards still don't understand that North Korea really does fulfill
the "reasons" Chimpoleon gave for invading Iraq.
I think the point I've been making is that North Korea has effective
deterrence, even excluding its nuclear capabilities whatever they may
be. For some reason you think that the US should invade a country that
that isn't an option with.
|
I think the point being made is that North Korea really does fulfil the
"reasons" Chimpoleon put forth to justify invading Iraq...
| Quote: |
Or do you suggest that we shouldn't do anything unless we can do
everything?
To him, you are a hypocrite if you invade one country but don't invade
every other country on the planet.
It's worse than hypocrisy to cook up lies to invade a country.
What are the "lies" supposed to be? Iraq is in a part of the world that
|
DUH - that Iraq had WMDs and was a world threat and HAD to be invaded? DUH
| Quote: |
is vital to the United States. Dealing with Iraq also helps with the
|
Irrelevant.
| Quote: |
process of dealing with bin Ladenism. What is North Korea again?
|
A country with an active WMD program... DUH
RT |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:00 am Post subject: Re: North Korea Tests More Missiles - When Do We Invade? |
|
|
patient WA-2349-06 male Caucasian, paranoid-schizophrenic Bill Bonde tittered 'Hi
ho':
| Quote: |
Rich Trolsky wrote:
Richard Burns wrote:
Rich Travsky wrote:
patient WA-2349-06 male Caucasian, paranoid-schizophrenic Bill Bonde giggled 'Hi ho':
Rich Trolsky wrote:
Ref at
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22north+Korea%22+missiles&btnG=Search+News
North Korea fired a salvo of test missiles into its coastal waters Friday, flexing
its naval muscles as South Korea launched its most advanced destroyer ever, armed
with a high-tech U.S. air-defense system.
...
Well?
What do you think asking that stupid question over and over again after
it has been answered over and over proves, I mean other than you are a
trolling idiot.
Poor Billie Bonkers still doesn't see that North Korea fulfills all the otherwise
lies used to invade Iraq...
Even most neocons know that a preemptive war would be bad for the GOP
and their business puppetmasters...tens of thousands of U.S. and South
Korean troops likely dead in a North Korean counterattack acrosss the
DMZ as well as North Korea flattening large chunks of Seoul, the capital
of the world's 10th largest economy, thru missile and artillery
strikes..and that's assuming the can't get some of their tanks
thru..this war would make Iraq and even a hypothetical attack
on Iran look mild in comparison. The aftereffcts would
probably plunge the world into depression.
If Japan gets hit as a result of a North Korean counterattack,
it may result in the presence of Japanese troops on the Korean
peninsula in a counterattack of their own. Japanese rightists
would try to stretch out an occupation as long as possible and possibly
try to extend it to South Korea for "security" reasons.
Could the U.S. win...certainly...eventually..after extremely heavy
casualties...it would probably the deadliest U.S. war since World War
II. Casualties could be in the hundreds of thousands within three
months, according to some estimates.
Such a war, if not viewed as absolutely necessary, could prove
potentially for the GOP and the conservative movement in the United
States and put corporate/elite interests in serious jeopardy by
pushing American public opinion significantly leftward on issues
as a whole, including corporate power.
Richard.
The US no longer has the capability to respond militarily to the NKs should
they try anything.
The US never had the capability to stop NK should it try anything, short
|
Yes, we did - until Chimpoleon bogged us down in Iraq.
| Quote: |
of using nuclear weapons, of course. NK has a million man army and the
only hope of stopping them is that they will likely all run to the
nearest Safeway for something to eat, and to the Macy's for a bit of
fashion, right after they get across the border. Maybe we could just
lock the doors and hold them there: "You have mo' Binny Baby, please?" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' ) Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:50 am Post subject: Re: North Korea Tests More Missiles - When Do We Invade? |
|
|
Rich Travsky wrote:
| Quote: |
patient WA-2349-06 male Caucasian, paranoid-schizophrenic Bill Bonde girlishly
giggled 'Hi ho': wrote:
Rich Trolsky wrote:
patient WA-2349-06 male Caucasian, paranoid-schizophrenic Bill Bonde giggled 'Hi ho':
harangueman@yahoo.com wrote:
On May 27, 1:45 am, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Ref at
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22north+Korea%22+missiles...
North Korea fired a salvo of test missiles into its coastal waters Friday, flexing
its naval muscles as South Korea launched its most advanced destroyer ever,
armed with a high-tech U.S. air-defense system.
...
Well?
I would hardly expect Rich Trotsky to advocate a military attack on
the DPRK. Why the sudden change from peacenik to war hawk?
Sudden? He's been asking when the US is going to invade NK since, oh,
since like 2003.
The poor rightards still don't understand that North Korea really does fulfill
the "reasons" Chimpoleon gave for invading Iraq.
I think the point I've been making is that North Korea has effective
deterrence, even excluding its nuclear capabilities whatever they may
be. For some reason you think that the US should invade a country that
that isn't an option with.
I think the point being made is that North Korea really does fulfil the
"reasons" Chimpoleon put forth to justify invading Iraq...
You really think that? Aren't they physically isolated? How physically |
isloated is Iraq?
| Quote: |
Or do you suggest that we shouldn't do anything unless we can do
everything?
To him, you are a hypocrite if you invade one country but don't invade
every other country on the planet.
It's worse than hypocrisy to cook up lies to invade a country.
What are the "lies" supposed to be? Iraq is in a part of the world that
DUH - that Iraq had WMDs and was a world threat and HAD to be invaded? DUH
Iraq had WMDs and used them in its war against Iran in the 80s, had them |
during the 1991 Gulf War, had many destroyed by inspectors over the
years. This fantasy that they were without any WMDs is just that,
fantasy.
| Quote: |
is vital to the United States. Dealing with Iraq also helps with the
Irrelevant.
process of dealing with bin Ladenism. What is North Korea again?
A country with an active WMD program... DUH
What is your point with this? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' ) Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:51 am Post subject: Re: North Korea Tests More Missiles - When Do We Invade? |
|
|
Rich Travsky wrote:
| Quote: |
patient WA-2349-06 male Caucasian, paranoid-schizophrenic Bill Bonde girlishly
giggled 'Hi ho': wrote:
Rich Trolsky wrote:
patient WA-2349-06 male Caucasian, paranoid-schizophrenic Bill Bonde giggled 'Hi ho':
harangueman@yahoo.com wrote:
On May 27, 1:45 am, Rich Travsky <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Ref at
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22north+Korea%22+missiles...
North Korea fired a salvo of test missiles into its coastal waters Friday, flexing
its naval muscles as South Korea launched its most advanced destroyer ever,
armed with a high-tech U.S. air-defense system.
...
Well?
I would hardly expect Rich Trotsky to advocate a military attack on
the DPRK. Why the sudden change from peacenik to war hawk?
Sudden? He's been asking when the US is going to invade NK since, oh,
since like 2003.
The poor rightards still don't understand that North Korea really does fulfill
the "reasons" Chimpoleon gave for invading Iraq.
I think the point I've been making is that North Korea has effective
deterrence, even excluding its nuclear capabilities whatever they may
be. For some reason you think that the US should invade a country that
that isn't an option with.
I think the point being made is that North Korea really does fulfil the
"reasons" Chimpoleon put forth to justify invading Iraq...
You really think that? Aren't they physically isolated? How physically |
isloated is Iraq?
| Quote: |
Or do you suggest that we shouldn't do anything unless we can do
everything?
To him, you are a hypocrite if you invade one country but don't invade
every other country on the planet.
It's worse than hypocrisy to cook up lies to invade a country.
What are the "lies" supposed to be? Iraq is in a part of the world that
DUH - that Iraq had WMDs and was a world threat and HAD to be invaded? DUH
Iraq had WMDs and used them in its war against Iran in the 80s, had them |
during the 1991 Gulf War, had many destroyed by inspectors over the
years. This fantasy that they were without any WMDs is just that,
fantasy.
| Quote: |
is vital to the United States. Dealing with Iraq also helps with the
Irrelevant.
Things that are vital to the US are "irrelevant"? |
| Quote: |
process of dealing with bin Ladenism. What is North Korea again?
A country with an active WMD program... DUH
What is your point with this? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|

1307 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|