Industry news
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Fred G. Mackey
Guest
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:38 am Post subject: Re: War in Iraq == War on Poverty. |
 |
|
Vitor wrote:
| Quote: |
There are US cities that are more dangerous than
Baghdad
|
You're wrong.
| Quote: |
so shouldn't we pull all federal employees out
|
We should certainly get rid of a lot of federal employees. Big gov't
benefits nobody except for government.
| Quote: |
because what they
doing is a failure and needless risking their lives. Detroit and
Chicago had more Murders than Baghdad
|
Bullshit.
| Quote: |
so we must support our FBI, and
federal employees out because they have totally failed and their lives
are being risked for a stupid cause. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:42 am Post subject: Christian Hate On Display Re: Wingnut Evangelist Casts Out R |
|
|
GW Chimpzilla's Eye-Rack Neocon Utopia wrote:
| Quote: |
WASHINGTON _ Florida evangelist Bill Keller says he was making a spiritual --
not political -- statement when he warned the 2.4 million subscribers to his
Internet prayer ministry that ``if you vote for Mitt Romney, you are voting for
Satan!''
|
This is a keeper.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:43 am Post subject: Re: Why does the RNC appeal to stupid people? |
|
|
David Moffitt wrote:
| Quote: |
%%%% It doesn't. Go into any project and see who the ignorant school
drop-outs vote for. " )
|
Project? Huh?
"You got til September" - republicons to Chimpoleon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:45 am Post subject: Re: Why does the RNC appeal to stupid people? Stupid people |
|
|
Kurt Lochner wrote:
| Quote: |
"vapid muffette" <moffittd@earthlink.net> whined and opined:
Rich Travsy wrote:
Let's see - Duhbya polling in low 30s - or lower - and rightards
voted out last November...
There ya go!
%%%% It doesn't. Go into any[..]
Oh, now you wouldn't want to be accused of a false generalization,
would you Dufus?
--See subject header for details.. Examples follow..
________________________________________________________________
"%%%% Shall we say $5,000?"
"%%%% Show us your wrong answer again!"
"%%%% It is quite apparent you cannot read since you got
the answer wrong."
"%%%% AMAZING! You got it wrong 20 times until you saw the
answer given by others!
"%%%% No need for an equation since objects fall at 32 feet
per second/per second and the ball was traveling at 1,000
feet per second.
|
Don't forget this doozy:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.california/msg/984a0a8a3009bb36?dmode=source
...
| Quote: |
%%%% Germany never attacked us.
USS Reuban James
USS Greer
Look it up
|
%%%% They were private ships and not military ones transporting weapons to
Europe. It was an attack on private ships and not our military or
government. Look up Pearl Harbor for an example.
| Quote: |
(1) How far will the cannon ball go before it hits the ground?
----> 1,000 feet
(2) How long will it take for the cannon ball to hit the ground?
----> 1 second.?
Nope..
Since y and v(0)*t both equal zero, here's the next step..
32f = 16f/s^2 * t^2
Dividing the 16 out of the right side..
32'/16' = 2 = t^2 thus t = square root of 2 = 1.414 seconds..
I gave you a chance to check your answer several times over..
--But noooooooo.. You had to go and be a dufus gun-tard.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:52 am Post subject: Re: Why does the RNC appeal to stupid people? |
|
|
Vitor wrote:
| Quote: |
Phlip wrote:
Harry Dope wrote:
Anyone know why the democratic party appeals to the most ignorant people
in USA society?
"The transition from dictatorship to democracy will take time, but it is
worth every effort. Our coalition will stay until our work is done and then
we will leave and we will leave behind a free Iraq." President George Bush
2003
I'm answering your question with your own sig tagline. Thanks!
--
Phlip
This is a glaring example of the stupid people, they respond with
non-sequesters. It also shows a hostility to freedom and why these
people prefer the terrorists and dictator. They don't care about
freedom or opposing those want to impose one of the most oppressive
systems in modern history.
|
This is a glaring example of the stupid people who fall for such
nonsense as the quote from Chimpoleon above...
RT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
liberalhere@yahoo.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:55 am Post subject: Re: Greatest economy in history remains storng despite liber |
|
|
<ahall@no-spam-panix.com> wrote in
news:kpgd50eru40.fsf@panix2.panix.com:
| Quote: |
liberalhere@yahoo com writes:
ahall@no-spam-panix.com> wrote in
news> kpgmyzjsuaj.fsf@panix2.panix.com:
CB writes:
CB> "Mani Deli" <mani@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news> 4vhu531g5u8ovqps0137f12imq653dd6ql@4ax.com...
Sure is!
The U.S. is run like Enron, they spout the same
bullshit, have two sets of books, release crooked
statistics and tell you all's well while they are
robbing you blind.
Wait a while and the whole thing will collapse.
Anyone who makes less than 60,000 and votes
Republican is voting to screw himself.
CB> The economy is growing, dumb ass.
Marginally.
liberalhere> Not counting the collapse of the US auto
industry, the transfer liberalhere> of the computer
industry to China, the transfer of consumer liberalhere
manufacturing to China. Apparently you think the
manufacturing of liberalhere> military hardware, to be
blown up in Iraq, is a positive.
Counting all of it. No, I do not think the adventure in Iraq
is positive in any way.
CB> The last two Dim Presidents had a Dims majority in
Congress for the most CB> part and put the economy in
(three months of consecutive decline) recession.
For six of Clinton's eight years there was a GOP
majority in both houses. Your ignorance is amazing.
The growth under Clinton was far greater than the growth
under either Bush, and a bit better than under Reagan.
Again, your ignorance is amazing.
CB> Republican Presidents spur growth and haven't ran
their economies into CB> recession.
Actually, post war, the economy has done significantly
better when a democrat is president. You could look up
these things before posting falsehoods, but for some
reason you prefer ignorance.
CB> You be sure and tell us when the Bush economy goes
into negative growth like CB> Dim lead economies.
When was the last recession while a democrat was in
office?
CB> If this immigration bill passes it'll be the end of
growth, forever.
Immigrants are good for growth.
liberalhere> You plan on paying the 2-3 trillion cost of
these illegals? Do liberalhere> you have rooms in your
house that a few illegal families could liberalhere> move
into? If 12-20 million illegals is "good", are you
demanding liberalhere> open borders for the one billion
poor Chinese and one billion liberalhere> poor Indians? Or
are you a racist?
People that come here and work are a benefit not a cost.
You need to educate yourself.
CB> The backlog of immigrants coming to America legally is
6 million. If the CB> bill passes there will be an
instant 18 million added to the backlog of CB
applicants to be processed. That means more bureaucracy,
more taxes and more CB> terrorists able to stay here
legally...at least until the bureaucracy CB> catches
them, which if government lives up to its failure to
protect us, CB> will be never.
It will mean more labor and more production. Good.
liberalhere> Ahhhh, you need a few more brown laborers in
your house to feel liberalhere> like a real American?
"More production"??? Care to say what you liberalhere
think we're "producing?
The more workers the more production. We produce more than
any other country in the world. You can look up the details
if you have any actual interest in facts (you seem like one
of the yahoos that prefers ideology to facts).
liberalhere> "Good"??? Here's a homework assignment for
you: List the liberalhere> countries of the world based on
their per capita output and liberalhere> whether a country
is self-sufficient in food. Guess what! The US
liberalhere> is no longer self-sufficient. Every
additional illegal is an liberalhere> increase in our
trade deficit.
Sheesh!
CB> You Libs whine about the most stupid things
You are amazingly ignorant.
liberalhere> And you seem unable to process new
information. Some might call liberalhere> that ignorance,
I suspect Alzheimer's.
I process new information all the time. I reject mindless
propaganda of the sort you seem to eat up.
|
Is the United States self-sufficient in food? Or are we a net
importer?
You gobble up the glen beck version of information.
You live in a Hooverian world, and for you it's 1928.
Try growing up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
geneccc@gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:56 am Post subject: Re: AWOL Bush Spreading Lie About Governor Who Blew Whistle |
|
|
On May 31, 3:23 pm, GW Chimpzilla's Eye-Rack Neocon Utopia
<g...@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
Earlier this month, after a tornado destroyed 95 percent of Greensburg, Kansas,
Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D-KS) spoke out about how the war in Iraq had severely
drained the state's National Guard, slowing recovery efforts for disaster
victims.
Now the Bush administration is exacting revenge:
Bush administration officials, stung by complaints from Democratic Gov.
Kathleen Sebelius that National Guard heavy equipment needed by
tornado-stricken Greensburg, Kan., is in Iraq, are putting out word that she
was two days late at the disaster scene because she was attending a jazz
festival in New Orleans.
But according to a report in today's Wichita Eagle, the Bush rumor is completely
false:
Yes, Sebelius was in New Orleans with her family when the tornado hit that
Friday evening. But she was notified that night about the tornado, and she and
her staff in Kansas immediately began trying to assess the damage. When the
scope of the disaster became clear, they began making arrangements for her
return.
Sebelius didn't attend any of the jazz festival and left her family in New
Orleans, flying back Saturday afternoon using a plane arranged by Louisiana
Gov. Kathleen Blanco.
[more]
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/31/sebelius-lie/
--
There are only two kinds of Republicans: Millionaires and fools.
|
The karl rove smear machine can destroy anyone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:58 am Post subject: Re: Why does the RNC appeal to stupid people? |
|
|
Vitor wrote:
| Quote: |
Harry Dope wrote:
Thanks for proving my point.
"Phlip" <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote in message
Harry Dope wrote:
Anyone know why the democratic party appeals to the most ignorant
people
in USA society?
"The transition from dictatorship to democracy will take time, but it is
worth every effort. Our coalition will stay until our work is done and
then
we will leave and we will leave behind a free Iraq." President George
Bush
2003
I'm answering your question with your own sig tagline. Thanks!
It is not so much their point of view that bothers me but their
religious intolerance to ideas they don't like. They don't debate or
persuade they personally attack those which indicates that they are not
confident in their ideas. They have their gospel and the rest of us are
heretics.
|
LOL. The republicons are well known for intolerance. Tom Delay wasn't called
the Hammer for nothing. And adulterer Gingrich's personal attacks on Clinton...
RT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guy
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:58 am Post subject: Re: Aluminum-water powered engines! |
|
|
"Paul F. Dietz" <dietz@dls.net> wrote in message
news:b5CdnYC6vPA_f_zbnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@dls.net...
| Quote: |
mimus wrote:
Sigh. This doesn't replace gasoline with water
Yes, actually, it does. But see below.
No, it doesn't. The water isn't burned, as gasoline
is. The net energy producing reaction is aluminum
+ oxygen --> aluminum oxide. Water is involved only
transiently, be regenerated when the hydrogen is
oxidized.
So, this is just a weird way of burning aluminum.
Wouldn't aluminum-air batteries be simpler and cheaper?
Paul
|
Water is hydrogen and oxygen. If the oxygen is used up to oxidize the
aluminum, the hydrogen is set free and can be burned by the engine.
But as a previous poster pointed out, the aluminum metal was originally
produced by using huge amounts of electricity to transform the aluminum ore
(bauxite) into the pure aluminum. And the aluminum oxide produced by this
process will need yet more electricity or some other energy source to
separate the oxygen from the aluminum to produce pure aluminum yet again.
As to the amount of electricity required, Alcan for one moves the bauxite
thousands of mile from mines in Central and South America to refineries in
the middle of nowhere in Quebec because that's where they can get cheap
hydroelectric power. The smelters are right next to hydro dams, not next to
bauxite mines. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:00 am Post subject: Re: Why does the RNC appeal to stupid people? |
|
|
Vitor wrote:
| Quote: |
Lamont Cranston wrote:
"Harry Dope" <TheWarIsLost@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:466033c1$0$9945$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
Anyone know why the democratic party appeals to the most ignorant
people in USA society?
It doesn't. I have two facts that prove it.
1 - You are not a Democrat
2 - Albert Einstein was a Democrat
rotfl
I am not a Democrat and I don't look at the world as Democrats do. They
have some hate for Republicans that goes back to Grant. I don't see the
|
Say what???? Since Grant? LOL
| Quote: |
Democrats as a party of eternal Evil. Even today there are some
Democrats I would find tolerable. It is a big picture difference. The
Democrats have push more and more costly government programs. They
|
Conveniently overlooking the current administration and Bonzo and Poppy's.
All three have exploded the deficit.
| Quote: |
always win. Government never gets smaller or a program ended or a
federal employee get downsized.
|
Gee, what's happened while republicons controlled the WH and Congress????
| Quote: |
I also don't buy the anti-war groupthink. I know too many people who
have fought and I value what they say over some reporter that only
presents the facts that support their side. From what I know about
terrorists and the hate they have had for us for generations, I am for
an active plan to defeat them not try to make them stop hating us.
|
What does invading Iraq have to do with that?
RT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:02 am Post subject: Re: Why does the RNC appeal to stupid people? |
|
|
Vitor wrote:
| Quote: |
Rich Travsky wrote:
Harry Dope wrote:
Anyone know why the democratic party appeals to the most ignorant people
in USA society?
Let's see - Duhbya polling in low 30s - or lower - and rightards voted out last
November...
There ya go!
The reason why we lost and they democrats gained a SLIM majority is that
|
Big lead in the House. But you knew that, right? Dems also won a majority
of state houses and governorships...
| Quote: |
our guys spent like Democrats. Government spending is a major issue for
Republican voters why should we get excited by a party that out does the
opposition?
|
Uh, spending?? No. Iraq.
| Quote: |
It is not an intelligence thing is an intolerance thing. That is there
|
Tell us why Tom Delay was called the Hammer...
| Quote: |
what I think and there are heretics. If they don;t think like me they
are not fully thinking humans. That attitude will make me less likely
to take into account of any information or opinions that you might have. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:03 am Post subject: Re: Why does the RNC appeal to stupid people? |
|
|
Vitor wrote:
| Quote: |
Bokonon wrote:
"Harry Dope" <TheWarIsLost@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:466033c1$0$9945$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
Anyone know why the democratic party appeals to the most ignorant people
in USA society?
How did that election go for you right-wingers last November again?
I forget.
How much are the Majorities, 67 in the Senate and 420 in the House?
|
Your numbers are ridiculous. Come back when you're informed a little better.
You don't appear to even know how many seats there are in the House.
| Quote: |
Nope it is a slim majority, with the polls and anger I read here I would
think it is the former. It is not that much to pick up especially the
senate where one vote is all that is needed. See what the leaders do
because they want power before they care about what you might have voted
for. My side let me down on some things but that still does not make
Democrats more attractive because I wand the opposite direction than
they want to go. Most of it has to do with government spending and the
government never does with less. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:03 am Post subject: Re: Why does the RNC appeal to stupid people? |
|
|
Loki Laufeyjarson wrote:
| Quote: |
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:57:02 -0400, "Harry Dope"
TheWarIsLost@earthlink.net> wrote:
Anyone know why the democratic party appeals to the most ignorant people
in USA society?
The two most important reasons are:
1. The shallow, easily refutable ideology of liberalism is quickly
identified by even the most common, non-politically aware
conservative. So, intelligent people are not useful fodder for
liberal political intrigue.
2. The ignorant, "too stupid to prosper" masses are easily manipulated
by wealthy, clever liberals. So that makes the unwashed masses the
only source of votes for liberals.
Any questions?
|
Why is Duhbya polling in the low 30s - or lower?
RT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
liberalhere@yahoo.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:12 am Post subject: Re: Why does the RNC appeal to stupid people? Stupid people |
|
|
Rich Travsky <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in
news:46624783.38DEB26D@hotmMOVEail.com:
| Quote: |
Kurt Lochner wrote:
"vapid muffette" <moffittd@earthlink.net> whined and opined:
Rich Travsy wrote:
Let's see - Duhbya polling in low 30s - or lower - and
rightards voted out last November...
There ya go!
%%%% It doesn't. Go into any[..]
Oh, now you wouldn't want to be accused of a false
generalization, would you Dufus?
--See subject header for details.. Examples follow..
_____________________________________________________________
___
"%%%% Shall we say $5,000?"
"%%%% Show us your wrong answer again!"
"%%%% It is quite apparent you cannot read since you got
the answer wrong."
"%%%% AMAZING! You got it wrong 20 times until you saw the
answer given by others!
"%%%% No need for an equation since objects fall at 32 feet
per second/per second and the ball was traveling at 1,000
feet per second.
Don't forget this doozy:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.california/msg/984a0a8a300
9bb36?dmode=source ...
%%%% Germany never attacked us.
USS Reuban James
USS Greer
Look it up
%%%% They were private ships and not military ones
transporting weapons to Europe. It was an attack on private
ships and not our military or government. Look up Pearl
Harbor for an example.
|
??????
From Wikipedia:
USS Reuben James (DD-245), a post-World War I four-stack Clemson-
class destroyer, was the first United States Navy ship sunk by
hostile action in World War
From the US Navy website:
On the morning of September 4, 1941, destroyer USS Greer (DD 145)
was enroute from Newfoundland to Iceland when she picked up sonar
contact with a German sub. A British patrol plane had warned
Greer that the U-boat was lurking in her path earlier. The
destroyer made and held contact uneventfully for nearly 3 1/2
hours, when suddenly, a torpedo was spotted heading for the ship.
Greer turned sharply, avoiding the torpedo, and let loose a salvo
of depth charges.Again, a sharp turn and another torpedo charged
by the destroyer, which was followed by a salvo of depth charges
from Greer. By late afternoon, Greer lost contact and after a
three-hour search, she continued on to Iceland. Apparently, the
sub had dropped the fight, but the attack prompted President
Roosevelt to issue orders to "shoot on sight" any warships within
"our defensive waters."
| Quote: |
(1) How far will the cannon ball go before it hits the
ground?
----> 1,000 feet
(2) How long will it take for the cannon ball to hit the
ground?
----> 1 second.?
Nope..
Since y and v(0)*t both equal zero, here's the next step..
32f = 16f/s^2 * t^2
Dividing the 16 out of the right side..
32'/16' = 2 = t^2 thus t = square root of 2 = 1.414
seconds..
I gave you a chance to check your answer several times
over..
--But noooooooo.. You had to go and be a dufus gun-tard..
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Mertis
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:35 am Post subject: Re: ElBaradei described those wanting to bomb Iran as "new c |
|
|
El Kabong wrote:
| Quote: |
Thursday, 31 May 2007, 14:01 GMT 15:01 UK
Nuclear watchdog's attack warning
By Rob Broomby
BBC News
The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog has given one of his sternest warnings
against using military action to halt Iran's uranium enrichment programme.
Dr Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency,
described those wanting to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities as "new crazies".
After Iraq, Dr ElBaradei said he did not want to see "another war".
He made his comments in an interview for a BBC Radio 4 documentary to be
broadcast at 2000BST on Friday.
This is not the first time that Dr ElBaradei has spoken out against the
possibility of using force against Iran, but it is perhaps his strongest
warning to date.
Tehran is still refusing to bow to demands from the UN Security Council to
halt its uranium enrichment programme, which the United States fears would
give it access to material for a bomb.
You do not want to give additional argument to new crazies who say 'let's go
and bomb Iran'
Dr Mohammad ElBaradei
Dr ElBaradei said a nuclear-armed Iran would be terrible but the jury was
still out as to whether the country even wanted nuclear weapons.
But he said you could not "bomb knowledge", and he was scathing towards
those who still favoured air strikes after the experience of intervention in
Iraq.
"I wake every morning and see 100 Iraqis innocent civilians are dying," he
said. "I have no brief other than to make sure we don't go into another war
or that we go crazy into killing each other. You do not want to give
additional argument to new crazies who say 'let's go and bomb Iran.'"
Asked who the "new crazies" were he replied: "Those who have extreme views
and say the only solution is to impose your will by force."
Dr ElBaradei said he was not referring to President George Bush but his
remarks are likely to be interpreted as a swipe at those neo-conservatives
in the US who still favour military action.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/nuclear_detectives/6707457.stm
|
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
652 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
