US News
US News
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Industry news
What is Ann Coulter bellyaching about?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    US News Forum Index -> US News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NeverExpectPowerAlways
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:29 am    Post subject: What is Ann Coulter bellyaching about? Reply with quote

"Lewis Libby has now been found guilty of perjury and obstruction of
justice for lies that had absolutely no legal consequence."



Lewis Libby lied about a blowjob?
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


John R Rybock
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 1:33 pm    Post subject: Re: What is Ann Coulter bellyaching about? Reply with quote

On Mar 7, 10:29 pm, NeverExpectPowerAlways <don't_even_...@noway.com>
wrote:
Quote:
"Lewis Libby has now been found guilty of perjury and obstruction of
justice for lies that had absolutely no legal consequence."

Lewis Libby lied about a blowjob?

Funny. Clinton lied about something that actually had no legal
consequence. What was her position on that one?
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Christian Williamson
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:31 pm    Post subject: Re: What is Ann Coulter bellyaching about? Reply with quote

John R Rybock wrote:
Quote:
On Mar 7, 10:29 pm, NeverExpectPowerAlways <don't_even_...@noway.com
wrote:
"Lewis Libby has now been found guilty of perjury and obstruction of
justice for lies that had absolutely no legal consequence."

Lewis Libby lied about a blowjob?

Funny. Clinton lied about something that actually had no legal
consequence. What was her position on that one?


Her position is that Republicans back off such prosecution, as did Trent
Lott when it came to conviction of the impeachment in the Senate.
However, that's not the way Dems operate. They push for conviction no
matter what. As Coulter puts it, it's illegal to be a Republican.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Guest






PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:10 pm    Post subject: Re: What is Ann Coulter bellyaching about? Reply with quote

On Mar 8, 6:31 am, Christian Williamson <c.wi...@verizon.net> wrote:
Quote:
John R Rybock wrote:
On Mar 7, 10:29 pm, NeverExpectPowerAlways <don't_even_...@noway.com
wrote:
"Lewis Libby has now been found guilty of perjury and obstruction of
justice for lies that had absolutely no legal consequence."

Lewis Libby lied about a blowjob?

Funny. Clinton lied about something that actually had no legal
consequence. What was her position on that one?

Her position is that Republicans back off such prosecution, as did Trent
Lott when it came to conviction of the impeachment in the Senate.
However, that's not the way Dems operate. They push for conviction no
matter what. As Coulter puts it, it's illegal to be a Republican.

It's not illegal to be a Republican but it *is* immoral to be one.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Constitutional American
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:13 pm    Post subject: Re: What is Ann Coulter bellyaching about? Reply with quote

On Mar 8, 6:10 am, kyld...@yahoo.com wrote:
Quote:
On Mar 8, 6:31 am, Christian Williamson <c.wi...@verizon.net> wrote:

John R Rybock wrote:
On Mar 7, 10:29 pm, NeverExpectPowerAlways <don't_even_...@noway.com
wrote:
"Lewis Libby has now been found guilty of perjury and obstruction of
justice for lies that had absolutely no legal consequence."

Lewis Libby lied about a blowjob?

Funny. Clinton lied about something that actually had no legal
consequence. What was her position on that one?

Her position is that Republicans back off such prosecution, as did Trent
Lott when it came to conviction of the impeachment in the Senate.
However, that's not the way Dems operate. They push for conviction no
matter what. As Coulter puts it, it's illegal to be a Republican.

It's not illegal to be a Republican but it *is* immoral to be one.

A paradox: How can a Republican be "immoral", while "holier than thou"
at the same time?
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


NosmoKing-
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:25 pm    Post subject: Re: What is Ann Coulter bellyaching about? Reply with quote

Christian Williamson <c.willi@verizon.net> wrote in news:kuSHh.1525$Ah.856
@trnddc07:

Quote:
As Coulter puts it, it's illegal to be a Republican.

Too bad it can't be, starting with you and Ann the Man.
I know, I know! I'm a "leftist Bush-hater", blah, blah blah. But that's the
kind of commentary that Annie and her minions like. They can say all tha
bullshit and it's cute. If a Democrat says it, then it's criminal
hypocracy. Personally, I don't give a shit what she says, but I hope she
keeps talking. Every time she opens her mouth she make Hillary look like a
quiet and respectable person who would make an excellent president.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Gr
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:59 pm    Post subject: Re: What is Ann Coulter bellyaching about? Reply with quote

"Christian Williamson" <c.willi@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:kuSHh.1525$Ah.856@trnddc07...
Quote:
John R Rybock wrote:
On Mar 7, 10:29 pm, NeverExpectPowerAlways <don't_even_...@noway.com
wrote:
"Lewis Libby has now been found guilty of perjury and obstruction of
justice for lies that had absolutely no legal consequence."

Lewis Libby lied about a blowjob?

Funny. Clinton lied about something that actually had no legal
consequence. What was her position on that one?


Her position is that Republicans back off such prosecution, as did Trent
Lott when it came to conviction of the impeachment in the Senate. However,
that's not the way Dems operate. They push for conviction no matter what.
As Coulter puts it, it's illegal to be a Republican.

And tell us Chrissy. Did Clinton not get impeached? Fool and a liar.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Mitchell Holman
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:25 pm    Post subject: Re: What is Ann Coulter bellyaching about? Reply with quote

Christian Williamson <c.willi@verizon.net> wrote in news:kuSHh.1525$Ah.856
@trnddc07:

Quote:
John R Rybock wrote:
On Mar 7, 10:29 pm, NeverExpectPowerAlways <don't_even_...@noway.com
wrote:
"Lewis Libby has now been found guilty of perjury and obstruction of
justice for lies that had absolutely no legal consequence."

Lewis Libby lied about a blowjob?

Funny. Clinton lied about something that actually had no legal
consequence. What was her position on that one?


Her position is that Republicans back off such prosecution, as did Trent
Lott when it came to conviction of the impeachment in the Senate.
However, that's not the way Dems operate. They push for conviction no
matter what. As Coulter puts it, it's illegal to be a Republican.




Modern Conseravative: Someone who can take time
out from whining about the liberal media and secular
education and activist judges and how no one respects
their "values" to claim that liberals are obsessed
with victimhood.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Server 13
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:44 pm    Post subject: Re: What is Ann Coulter bellyaching about? Reply with quote

"Christian Williamson" <c.willi@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:kuSHh.1525$Ah.856@trnddc07...
Quote:
John R Rybock wrote:
On Mar 7, 10:29 pm, NeverExpectPowerAlways <don't_even_...@noway.com
wrote:
"Lewis Libby has now been found guilty of perjury and obstruction of
justice for lies that had absolutely no legal consequence."

Lewis Libby lied about a blowjob?

Funny. Clinton lied about something that actually had no legal
consequence. What was her position on that one?


Her position is that Republicans back off such prosecution,

Cite?.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


NoGoals
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:50 am    Post subject: Re: What is Ann Coulter bellyaching about? Reply with quote

On Mar 8, 4:13 am, "Constitutional American" <wespen...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Quote:
On Mar 8, 6:10 am, kyld...@yahoo.com wrote:



On Mar 8, 6:31 am, Christian Williamson <c.wi...@verizon.net> wrote:

John R Rybock wrote:
On Mar 7, 10:29 pm, NeverExpectPowerAlways <don't_even_...@noway.com
wrote:
"Lewis Libby has now been found guilty of perjury and obstruction of
justice for lies that had absolutely no legal consequence."

Lewis Libby lied about a blowjob?

Funny. Clinton lied about something that actually had no legal
consequence. What was her position on that one?

Her position is that Republicans back off such prosecution, as did Trent
Lott when it came to conviction of the impeachment in the Senate.
However, that's not the way Dems operate. They push for conviction no
matter what. As Coulter puts it, it's illegal to be a Republican.

It's not illegal to be a Republican but it *is* immoral to be one.

A paradox: How can a Republican be "immoral", while "holier than thou"
at the same time?

When you grow up and get more worldly experience you'll learn that
those with true morals know their own shortcomings and realize making
a claim of superiority is inconsistent with morality. And that those
claiming to be "holier than thou" are projecting against their own
inadequacies and invalidate their claim simply by the act of making
such claim.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Guest






PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 3:27 am    Post subject: Re: What is Ann Coulter bellyaching about? Reply with quote

On Mar 8, 6:13 am, "Constitutional American" <wespen...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Quote:
On Mar 8, 6:10 am, kyld...@yahoo.com wrote:





On Mar 8, 6:31 am, Christian Williamson <c.wi...@verizon.net> wrote:

John R Rybock wrote:
On Mar 7, 10:29 pm, NeverExpectPowerAlways <don't_even_...@noway.com
wrote:
"Lewis Libby has now been found guilty of perjury and obstruction of
justice for lies that had absolutely no legal consequence."

Lewis Libby lied about a blowjob?

Funny. Clinton lied about something that actually had no legal
consequence. What was her position on that one?

Her position is that Republicans back off such prosecution, as did Trent
Lott when it came to conviction of the impeachment in the Senate.
However, that's not the way Dems operate. They push for conviction no
matter what. As Coulter puts it, it's illegal to be a Republican.

It's not illegal to be a Republican but it *is* immoral to be one.

A paradox: How can a Republican be "immoral", while "holier than thou"
at the same time?


This might blow your <cough> mind, Constipated American, but
pretending to be morally upright is not the same as being morally
upright. Take a few deep breaths and chew on that. You can do it!
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


John R Rybock
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:57 pm    Post subject: Re: What is Ann Coulter bellyaching about? Reply with quote

On Mar 8, 3:31 am, Christian Williamson <c.wi...@verizon.net> wrote:
Quote:
John RRybockwrote:
On Mar 7, 10:29 pm, NeverExpectPowerAlways <don't_even_...@noway.com
wrote:
"Lewis Libby has now been found guilty of perjury and obstruction of
justice for lies that had absolutely no legal consequence."

Lewis Libby lied about a blowjob?

Funny. Clinton lied about something that actually had no legal
consequence. What was her position on that one?

Her position is that Republicans back off such prosecution, as did Trent
Lott when it came to conviction of the impeachment in the Senate.
However, that's not the way Dems operate. They push for conviction no
matter what. As Coulter puts it, it's illegal to be a Republican.

Apparently her position now. What was it then? What did she say about
it then?

Given many using this pointless talking point seem to think no charges
should have been brought in the first place, then it goes to reason
they don't think there should have been any impeachment, much less a
conviction, of Clinton.

Also, if Republicans "backed off", how is it a large majority of
Republicans in the Senate voted for conviction? There wasn't a
conviction because a few voted against it, so it's not like they all
opposed it.

And, lastly, Fitzgerald was a Republican appointment, and only brought
a case for which he could (and did) get a conviction.

Republicans - tough on crime, unless we're the ones doing it.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    US News Forum Index -> US News All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Board Security

1330 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group