Industry news
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
CB
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:17 pm Post subject: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases than |
 |
|
For all the good he's done for the environment-which, to be fair, is an
awful lot-Al's leaving out a huge piece of the puzzle by ignoring the fact
that the devastation caused by the meat industry
(http://goveg.com/environment.asp) is among the worst environmental
disasters ever to happen to the world. As we told him in our letter, sent
earlier this week:
While the steps that you urge people to take in An Inconvenient Truth are
inarguably important, the quickest and most effective way to fight climate
change will come through diet change.
An inconvenient truth for him, maybe, but it's the truth nonetheless. Since
he might not have seen the recent U.N. reports
(http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20772&Cr=global&Cr1=environment)
on the subject, we pointed out to him that animals raised for food generate
more greenhouse gases (http://goveg.com/environment-globalwarming.asp) than
all cars and trucks combined, and that (according to a recent University of
Chicago study), switching to a vegan diet is more effective in countering
global warming than switching from a standard American car to a Prius. We've
also offered to cook him some faux "fried chicken" as an introduction to
meat-free meals, since, however many documentaries you make, you just can't
be a meat-eating environmentalist. I'll let you know if he gets back to us.
http://blog.peta.org/archives/2007/03/clearing_a_few.php
--
CB
What put's Algore in his lockbox?
http://home.austarnet.com.au/yours/Global%20Warming%20Problem.gif
2006 power bill
http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/07.03.04.ConspicConsump-X.gif
Global warming on Mars
In its ninth year in orbit around Mars, NASA's Mars Global Surveyor has made
a number of surprising discoveries. For three Mars summers in a row,
deposits of frozen carbon dioxide near Mars' south pole have shrunk from the
previous year's size, suggesting a climate change in progress. Apparently,
President Bush's environmental policies are so destructive that they are
causing global warming throughout the solar system.
--Harry Dope |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
pearl
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:31 pm Post subject: Re: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases t |
|
|
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message news:45f01afe$0$5249$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
| Quote: |
For all the good he's done for the environment-which, to be fair, is an
awful lot-Al's leaving out a huge piece of the puzzle by ignoring the fact
that the devastation caused by the meat industry
(http://goveg.com/environment.asp) is among the worst environmental
disasters ever to happen to the world. As we told him in our letter, sent
earlier this week:
While the steps that you urge people to take in An Inconvenient Truth are
inarguably important, the quickest and most effective way to fight climate
change will come through diet change.
An inconvenient truth for him, maybe, but it's the truth nonetheless. Since
he might not have seen the recent U.N. reports
(http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20772&Cr=global&Cr1=environment)
on the subject, we pointed out to him that animals raised for food generate
more greenhouse gases (http://goveg.com/environment-globalwarming.asp) than
all cars and trucks combined, and that (according to a recent University of
Chicago study), switching to a vegan diet is more effective in countering
global warming than switching from a standard American car to a Prius. We've
also offered to cook him some faux "fried chicken" as an introduction to
meat-free meals, since, however many documentaries you make, you just can't
be a meat-eating environmentalist. I'll let you know if he gets back to us.
http://blog.peta.org/archives/2007/03/clearing_a_few.php
|
Yes! Thank you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
CB
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:52 pm Post subject: Re: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases t |
|
|
"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:esp6kv$ln7$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
| Quote: |
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:45f01afe$0$5249$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
For all the good he's done for the environment-which, to be fair, is an
awful lot-Al's leaving out a huge piece of the puzzle by ignoring the
fact
that the devastation caused by the meat industry
(http://goveg.com/environment.asp) is among the worst environmental
disasters ever to happen to the world. As we told him in our letter, sent
earlier this week:
While the steps that you urge people to take in An Inconvenient Truth
are
inarguably important, the quickest and most effective way to fight
climate
change will come through diet change.
An inconvenient truth for him, maybe, but it's the truth nonetheless.
Since
he might not have seen the recent U.N. reports
(http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20772&Cr=global&Cr1=environment)
on the subject, we pointed out to him that animals raised for food
generate
more greenhouse gases (http://goveg.com/environment-globalwarming.asp)
than
all cars and trucks combined, and that (according to a recent University
of
Chicago study), switching to a vegan diet is more effective in countering
global warming than switching from a standard American car to a Prius.
We've
also offered to cook him some faux "fried chicken" as an introduction to
meat-free meals, since, however many documentaries you make, you just
can't
be a meat-eating environmentalist. I'll let you know if he gets back to
us.
http://blog.peta.org/archives/2007/03/clearing_a_few.php
Yes! Thank you!
|
You're welcome
I'm going threw withdraws already. I used half the milk and omitted the
cheese I usually put in my eggs ;)
It'll get better |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
pearl
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 8:25 pm Post subject: Re: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases t |
|
|
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message news:45f02321$0$5762$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
| Quote: |
"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:esp6kv$ln7$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:45f01afe$0$5249$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
For all the good he's done for the environment-which, to be fair, is an
awful lot-Al's leaving out a huge piece of the puzzle by ignoring the
fact that the devastation caused by the meat industry
(http://goveg.com/environment.asp) is among the worst environmental
disasters ever to happen to the world. As we told him in our letter, sent
earlier this week:
While the steps that you urge people to take in An Inconvenient Truth are
inarguably important, the quickest and most effective way to fight climate
change will come through diet change.
An inconvenient truth for him, maybe, but it's the truth nonetheless.
Since he might not have seen the recent U.N. reports
(http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20772&Cr=global&Cr1=environment)
on the subject, we pointed out to him that animals raised for food generate
more greenhouse gases (http://goveg.com/environment-globalwarming.asp)
than all cars and trucks combined, and that (according to a recent University
of Chicago study), switching to a vegan diet is more effective in countering
global warming than switching from a standard American car to a Prius.
We've also offered to cook him some faux "fried chicken" as an introduction to
meat-free meals, since, however many documentaries you make, you just can't
be a meat-eating environmentalist. I'll let you know if he gets back to us.
http://blog.peta.org/archives/2007/03/clearing_a_few.php
Yes! Thank you!
You're welcome
I'm going threw withdraws already. I used half the milk and omitted the
cheese I usually put in my eggs ;)
It'll get better
|
No need to suffer at all. Substitute, substitute, substitute..
http://vegcooking.com/VegCooking.asp , also
http://www.living-foods.com/recipes/ . ... And enjoy.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 8:28 pm Post subject: Re: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases t |
|
|
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:17:32 -0500, "CB"
<CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
For all the good he's done for the environment-which, to be fair, is an
awful lot-Al's leaving out a huge piece of the puzzle by ignoring the fact
that the devastation caused by the meat industry
|
Don't you ever stop babbling---or finding babbling,
nonsensical spam articles? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Pete ‹(•¿•)›
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:08 pm Post subject: Re: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases t |
|
|
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:52:16 -0500, "CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:esp6kv$ln7$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:45f01afe$0$5249$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
For all the good he's done for the environment-which, to be fair, is an
awful lot-Al's leaving out a huge piece of the puzzle by ignoring the
fact
that the devastation caused by the meat industry
(http://goveg.com/environment.asp) is among the worst environmental
disasters ever to happen to the world. As we told him in our letter, sent
earlier this week:
While the steps that you urge people to take in An Inconvenient Truth
are
inarguably important, the quickest and most effective way to fight
climate
change will come through diet change.
An inconvenient truth for him, maybe, but it's the truth nonetheless.
Since
he might not have seen the recent U.N. reports
(http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20772&Cr=global&Cr1=environment)
on the subject, we pointed out to him that animals raised for food
generate
more greenhouse gases (http://goveg.com/environment-globalwarming.asp)
than
all cars and trucks combined, and that (according to a recent University
of
Chicago study), switching to a vegan diet is more effective in countering
global warming than switching from a standard American car to a Prius.
We've
also offered to cook him some faux "fried chicken" as an introduction to
meat-free meals, since, however many documentaries you make, you just
can't
be a meat-eating environmentalist. I'll let you know if he gets back to
us.
http://blog.peta.org/archives/2007/03/clearing_a_few.php
Yes! Thank you!
You're welcome
I'm going threw withdraws already. I used half the milk and omitted the
cheese I usually put in my eggs ;)
It'll get better
|
LOL. Try vegetarian first, then vegan. You might find it easier.
--
Avoid the rush at the last judgement. Be converted now instead!
Disclaimer
Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.
It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.
Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
James
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:01 pm Post subject: Re: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases t |
|
|
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:45f02321$0$5762$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
| Quote: |
"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:esp6kv$ln7$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:45f01afe$0$5249$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
For all the good he's done for the environment-which, to be fair, is an
awful lot-Al's leaving out a huge piece of the puzzle by ignoring the
fact
that the devastation caused by the meat industry
(http://goveg.com/environment.asp) is among the worst environmental
disasters ever to happen to the world. As we told him in our letter,
sent
earlier this week:
While the steps that you urge people to take in An Inconvenient Truth
are
inarguably important, the quickest and most effective way to fight
climate
change will come through diet change.
An inconvenient truth for him, maybe, but it's the truth nonetheless.
Since
he might not have seen the recent U.N. reports
(http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20772&Cr=global&Cr1=environment)
on the subject, we pointed out to him that animals raised for food
generate
more greenhouse gases (http://goveg.com/environment-globalwarming.asp)
than
all cars and trucks combined, and that (according to a recent University
of
Chicago study), switching to a vegan diet is more effective in
countering
global warming than switching from a standard American car to a Prius.
We've
also offered to cook him some faux "fried chicken" as an introduction to
meat-free meals, since, however many documentaries you make, you just
can't
be a meat-eating environmentalist. I'll let you know if he gets back to
us.
http://blog.peta.org/archives/2007/03/clearing_a_few.php
Yes! Thank you!
You're welcome
I'm going threw withdraws already. I used half the milk and omitted the
cheese I usually put in my eggs ;)
It'll get better
So you are switching to vegetarianism for the global warming scam? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
zzbunker@netscape.net
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:01 pm Post subject: Re: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases t |
|
|
On Mar 8, 9:17 am, "CB" <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
For all the good he's done for the environment-which, to be fair, is an
awful lot-Al's leaving out a huge piece of the puzzle by ignoring the fact
that the devastation caused by the meat industry
(http://goveg.com/environment.asp) is among the worst environmental
disasters ever to happen to the world. As we told him in our letter, sent
earlier this week:
|
We knew that though,
Which is why Al Gore discovered
the San Franciso bridge.
Since it is meatless, and
100% pure Excel Laptop morons.
| Quote: |
While the steps that you urge people to take in An Inconvenient Truth are
inarguably important, the quickest and most effective way to fight climate
change will come through diet change.
An inconvenient truth for him, maybe, but it's the truth nonetheless. Since
he might not have seen the recent U.N. reports
(http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20772&Cr=global&Cr1=envi...)
on the subject, we pointed out to him that animals raised for food generate
more greenhouse gases (http://goveg.com/environment-globalwarming.asp) than
all cars and trucks combined, and that (according to a recent University of
Chicago study), switching to a vegan diet is more effective in countering
global warming than switching from a standard American car to a Prius. We've
also offered to cook him some faux "fried chicken" as an introduction to
meat-free meals, since, however many documentaries you make, you just can't
be a meat-eating environmentalist. I'll let you know if he gets back to us.
http://blog.peta.org/archives/2007/03/clearing_a_few.php
--
CB
What put's Algore in his lockbox?http://home.austarnet.com.au/yours/Global%20Warming%20Problem.gif
2006 power billhttp://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/07.03.04.ConspicConsump-X.gif
Global warming on Mars
In its ninth year in orbit around Mars, NASA's Mars Global Surveyor has made
a number of surprising discoveries. For three Mars summers in a row,
deposits of frozen carbon dioxide near Mars' south pole have shrunk from the
previous year's size, suggesting a climate change in progress. Apparently,
President Bush's environmental policies are so destructive that they are
causing global warming throughout the solar system.
--Harry Dope |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
CB
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:39 pm Post subject: Re: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases t |
|
|
"James" <kingkongg@iglou.com> wrote in message
news:45f0414c$1_1@news.iglou.com...
| Quote: |
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:45f02321$0$5762$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:esp6kv$ln7$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:45f01afe$0$5249$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
For all the good he's done for the environment-which, to be fair, is an
awful lot-Al's leaving out a huge piece of the puzzle by ignoring the
fact
that the devastation caused by the meat industry
(http://goveg.com/environment.asp) is among the worst environmental
disasters ever to happen to the world. As we told him in our letter,
sent
earlier this week:
While the steps that you urge people to take in An Inconvenient Truth
are
inarguably important, the quickest and most effective way to fight
climate
change will come through diet change.
An inconvenient truth for him, maybe, but it's the truth nonetheless.
Since
he might not have seen the recent U.N. reports
(http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20772&Cr=global&Cr1=environment)
on the subject, we pointed out to him that animals raised for food
generate
more greenhouse gases (http://goveg.com/environment-globalwarming.asp)
than
all cars and trucks combined, and that (according to a recent
University of
Chicago study), switching to a vegan diet is more effective in
countering
global warming than switching from a standard American car to a Prius.
We've
also offered to cook him some faux "fried chicken" as an introduction
to
meat-free meals, since, however many documentaries you make, you just
can't
be a meat-eating environmentalist. I'll let you know if he gets back to
us.
http://blog.peta.org/archives/2007/03/clearing_a_few.php
Yes! Thank you!
You're welcome
I'm going threw withdraws already. I used half the milk and omitted the
cheese I usually put in my eggs ;)
It'll get better
So you are switching to vegetarianism for the global warming scam?
|
Not for that, to reduce the pollution that cows and chickens excrete into
the soil
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Lloyd
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:31 pm Post subject: Re: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases t |
|
|
On Mar 8, 9:17 am, "CB" <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
For all the good he's done for the environment-which, to be fair, is an
awful lot-Al's leaving out a huge piece of the puzzle by ignoring the fact
that the devastation caused by the meat industry
(http://goveg.com/environment.asp) is among the worst environmental
disasters ever to happen to the world. As we told him in our letter, sent
earlier this week:
While the steps that you urge people to take in An Inconvenient Truth are
inarguably important, the quickest and most effective way to fight climate
change will come through diet change.
An inconvenient truth for him, maybe, but it's the truth nonetheless. Since
he might not have seen the recent U.N. reports
(http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20772&Cr=global&Cr1=envi...)
on the subject, we pointed out to him that animals raised for food generate
more greenhouse gases (http://goveg.com/environment-globalwarming.asp) than
all cars and trucks combined, and that (according to a recent University of
Chicago study),
|
Yes, but animals have been putting out CO2 for millions of years. So
(1) it's in equilibrium and (2) the CO2 uses new carbon, not old.
| Quote: |
switching to a vegan diet is more effective in countering
global warming than switching from a standard American car to a Prius.
|
For that matter, so is holding your breath.
| Quote: |
We've
also offered to cook him some faux "fried chicken" as an introduction to
meat-free meals, since, however many documentaries you make, you just can't
be a meat-eating environmentalist. I'll let you know if he gets back to us.
http://blog.peta.org/archives/2007/03/clearing_a_few.php
--
CB
What put's Algore in his lockbox?http://home.austarnet.com.au/yours/Global%20Warming%20Problem.gif
2006 power billhttp://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/07.03.04.ConspicConsump-X.gif
Global warming on Mars
In its ninth year in orbit around Mars, NASA's Mars Global Surveyor has made
a number of surprising discoveries. For three Mars summers in a row,
deposits of frozen carbon dioxide near Mars' south pole have shrunk from the
previous year's size, suggesting a climate change in progress. Apparently,
President Bush's environmental policies are so destructive that they are
causing global warming throughout the solar system.
--Harry Dope
|
Apparently you are an idiot. But why flaunt it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Umberto Ramirez
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:58 pm Post subject: Re: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases t |
|
|
In article <45f01afe$0$5249$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
For all the good he's done for the environment-which, to be fair, is an
awful lot-Al's leaving out a huge piece of the puzzle by ignoring the fact
that the devastation caused by the meat industry
(http://goveg.com/environment.asp) is among the worst environmental
disasters ever to happen to the world. As we told him in our letter, sent
earlier this week:
While the steps that you urge people to take in An Inconvenient Truth are
inarguably important, the quickest and most effective way to fight climate
change will come through diet change.
An inconvenient truth for him, maybe, but it's the truth nonetheless. Since
he might not have seen the recent U.N. reports
(http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20772&Cr=global&Cr1=environment)
on the subject, we pointed out to him that animals raised for food generate
more greenhouse gases (http://goveg.com/environment-globalwarming.asp) than
all cars and trucks combined, and that (according to a recent University of
Chicago study), switching to a vegan diet is more effective in countering
global warming than switching from a standard American car to a Prius. We've
also offered to cook him some faux "fried chicken" as an introduction to
meat-free meals, since, however many documentaries you make, you just can't
be a meat-eating environmentalist. I'll let you know if he gets back to us.
http://blog.peta.org/archives/2007/03/clearing_a_few.php
|
I appreciate that you recognize that the amount of greenhouse gasses
produced by 'all the cars and trucks combined' is relatively low.
But I wonder if you appreciate the fact that the animals we raise as
food have been domesticated to such an extent that to stop eating them
and stop raising them, they will become extinct - they lack the natural
defenses and metabolism to successfully exist in the wild.
They'd still have to dies, somehow. We would either have to kill them
all off until the supply is exhausted - and then quit eating them 'cold
turkey', as it were or, we'd have to care for them in some kind of adult
care cow facility or home. This is impractical, because there is not
enough time to train enough people to provide hospice care to elderly
cows, and the farmers will be busy, out looking for new, more
earth-friendly jobs.
Not only that, but take veal, which accounts for only 1/12 of the total
production of beef cattle. Allowing these animals to live several years
longer than they would have otherwise, would have a counterproductive
effect, as there would temporarily be a 7-8 percent rise in population
from those animals, which translates into more global warming, more
quickly, to say nothing of the much greater rise in population of the
steers and heifers that would be living to a ripe old age. Without
continued production, there would be a sudden, devastating increase in
greenhouse gasses on Earth, and potentially the entire solar system, for
all we know. (send me a grant and I'll check it out)
A much better solution would be to slaughter all those animals we DON'T
eat - and as quickly as possible. This would have an immediate,
BENEFICIAL effect for the Earth, and still allow people the choice of
meat until they become fully indoctrinated.
That way humans, as a population, would taper off their consumption, as
the supplies naturally dwindle.
In fact, a kind of compromise could be reached that would make it both
easier for people to live with, and at the same time, benefit mother
earth: for example, one elephant produces 15 times more greenhouse
gasses than domesticated cattle, and a hippo a whopping 25 times more.
Slaughtering an elephant and a hippo would allow for the continued
husbandry of 40 ordinary cattle, so we could taper back consumption that
way. Once the Elephants and Hippos are gone, we can either look at
other animals, such as elk, moose and giraffes, or just start killing
off more cows. Of course, we'd have to be careful so the earth doesn't
get 'too' cold.
Other than that, it's a great idea, but we have to look at the effects
of our actions on mother Earth.
;) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Joe Fischer
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:51 am Post subject: Re: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases t |
|
|
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 "pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote:
Go ahead, but if you don't eat meat at least
twice per week, then a lot of corn and beans are
needed to provide the essential amino acids to
sustain life, and natural human produced insulin
is just about all amino acids.
Joe Fischer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Joe Fischer
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:56 am Post subject: Re: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases t |
|
|
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 "CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
It'll get better
So you are switching to vegetarianism for the global warming scam?
Not for that, to reduce the pollution that cows and chickens excrete into
the soil
|
Then the farmers will have to buy more fertilizer
made from natural gas, is that your object?
Joe Fischer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
pearl
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:03 am Post subject: Re: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases t |
|
|
"Joe Fischer" <joe@bigscreencomputers.com> wrote in message news:c511v2pomsdml5ab4vjd2lck27b72q21e4@4ax.com...
| Quote: |
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 "pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote:
I'm going threw withdraws already. I used half the milk and omitted the
cheese I usually put in my eggs ;)
It'll get better
No need to suffer at all. Substitute, substitute, substitute..
http://vegcooking.com/VegCooking.asp , also
http://www.living-foods.com/recipes/ . ... And enjoy. :)
Go ahead, but if you don't eat meat at least
twice per week, then a lot of corn and beans are
needed to provide the essential amino acids to
sustain life, and natural human produced insulin
is just about all amino acids.
|
'Analyses of data from the China studies by his collaborators
and others, Campbell told the epidemiology symposium, is
leading to policy recommendations. He mentioned three:
* The greater the variety of plant-based foods in the diet, the
greater the benefit. Variety insures broader coverage of known
and unknown nutrient needs.
* Provided there is plant food variety, quality and quantity,
a healthful and nutritionally complete diet can be attained
without animal-based food.
* The closer the food is to its native state - with minimal
heating, salting and processing - the greater will be the benefit.
http://www.sdearthtimes.com/et1101/et1101s18.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
pearl
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:09 am Post subject: Re: Animals raised for food generate more greenhouse gases t |
|
|
"Joe Fischer" <joe@bigscreencomputers.com> wrote in message news:bi11v21gn5d5eb9jjrkai1qe79q9rr1j1e@4ax.com...
| Quote: |
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 "CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
It'll get better
So you are switching to vegetarianism for the global warming scam?
Not for that, to reduce the pollution that cows and chickens excrete into
the soil
Then the farmers will have to buy more fertilizer
made from natural gas, is that your object?
|
'In 1991, Dr. Sanchez accepted a position as the head of ICRAF
in Nairobi, Kenya. There, he quickly discovered that African
agricultural production lagged due to the extremely depleted nature
of the soil. Dr. Sanchez' most enduring contribution to ending
world hunger has been his development of the means to replenish
crucial nutrients in exhausted soils, through the development and
promotion of agroforestry. This practice of planting trees on farms,
when combined with adding locally available rock phosphate to
the soil, has provided farmers in Africa with a way to fertilize
their soils inexpensively and naturally, without relying on costly
chemical fertilizers.
The 150,000 small scale farmers who are utilizing Dr. Sanchez'
methods are experiencing greatly increased yields, in some cases
200% to 400% above previous plantings. In response to this
success, ICRAF plans to help African farmers plant 5.5 billion
more trees over the next decade, the equivalent of another
tropical rainforest. ICRAF's goal is to move 20 million people
out of poverty and remove more that 100 million tons of CO2
from the air with this project.'
http://www.worldfoodprize.org/2002Laureate/pressrelease.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
1330 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
